2021 考研英语二 Translation
2021 考研英语二 Translation
Section III Translation 46. Directions: Translate the following text into Chinese. Write your translation on the ANSWER SHEET. (15 points) We tend to think that friends and family members are our biggest sources of connection, laughter, and warmth. While that may well be true, researchers have also recently found that interacting with strangers actually brings a boost in mood and feelings of belonging that we didn’t expect. In one series of studies, researchers instructed Chicago-area commuters using public transportation to strike up a conversation with someone near them. On average, participants who followed this instruction felt better than those who had been told to stand or sit in silence. The researchers also argued that when we shy away from casual interactions with strangers, it is often due to a misplaced anxiety that they might not want to talk to us. Much of the time, however, this belief is false. As it turns out, many people are actually perfectly willing to talk— and may even be flattered to receive your attention.
Echo 参考译文、难点评析与错误点总结
说明:以下为 Echo 生成的非官方参考译文和学习解析,用于自测、批改和复盘;不等同于官方答案。
Echo 参考译文
我们往往认为,朋友和家人是联系、欢笑和温暖的最大来源。这很可能不错,但研究人员最近也发现,与陌生人交流其实也会带来情绪提升和归属感,这是我们原来没想到的。 在一系列研究中,研究人员让芝加哥地区使用公共交通的通勤者与旁边的乘客攀谈。总体来说,遵从交谈指令的人的感觉要好于按要求默默站着或坐着的人。研究人员还指出,我们之所以回避与陌生人闲聊,常常是出于一种不必要的担心,以为他们可能不想跟我们说话。然而,这种想法很多时候是错的。事实表明,很多人其实非常乐意交谈,甚至还会因为得到你的关注而感到荣幸。
整体难点评析
本文主题可归为“人际沟通与社会心理”。英语二翻译通常为整段翻译,共 15 分。复盘时要把段落连贯性、代词指代、句间转折和整体语气一起处理,而不是孤立翻每一句。
- 结构难点:重点关注名词化结构、被动与非谓语、逻辑连接、修饰后置、长句主干识别。先找主句谓语,再处理从句、分词、介词短语和插入成分,避免在中文里把修饰关系接错。
- 词义难点:不要机械使用词典第一义,尤其是抽象名词、学术动词和评价性形容词。应根据上下文确定它们是在表示事实、趋势、原因、态度还是结果。
- 逻辑难点:翻译时要显化英语中的因果、转折、让步、递进和目的关系。中文可以调整语序,但不能丢掉逻辑方向。
- 表达难点:中文译文要准确优先,再追求通顺。可以适度增补主语或承接词,但不能加入原文没有的信息。
常见错误点总结
- 主干误判:把修饰成分当主句,或漏掉真正谓语,会导致整句方向错误。
- 修饰范围错误:定语从句、分词短语和介词短语常常后置,翻译时要判断它修饰哪个名词或动作。
- 抽象名词处理生硬:如 process、approach、engagement、movement、connection 等词,要根据上下文译成“过程、方式、参与、运动、联系”等合适表达。
- 逻辑词漏译或反译:but、despite、while、so、as、with 等小词常决定句子关系,是扣分高发点。
- 中文表达不成句:逐词硬贴会让译文读不通。建议译完后用中文默读一遍,检查主语、谓语、宾语和逻辑连接是否完整。
Discussion
Comments
Thoughts, corrections, and follow-up notes are welcome here.