2020 考研英语一 Section II Part C Translation
英语/考研英语真题/00-真题总目录|真题总目录 › 英语/考研英语真题/英语一/00-英语一目录|英语一 › 英语/考研英语真题/英语一/2020/00-2020 英语一导航|2020 英语一
💡 【说明】 来源
本页由原始语料生成;需要核对时请打开 📄 原始语料。
2020 考研英语一 Section II Part C Translation
Part C Directions: Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. Write your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points) Following the explosion of creativity in Florence during the 14th century known as the Renaissance, the modern world saw a departure from what it had once known. It turned from God and the authority of the Roman Catholic Church and instead favoured a more humanistic approach to being. Renaissance ideas had spread throughout Europe well into the 17th century, with the arts and sciences flourishing extraordinarily among those with a more logical disposition. (46) With the Church’s teachings and ways of thinking being eclipsed by the Renaissance, the gap between the Medieval and modern periods had been bridged, leading to new and unexplored intellectual territories. During the Renaissance, the great minds of Nicolaus Copernicus, Johannes Kepler and Galileo Galilei demonstrated the power of scientific study and discovery. (47) Before each of their revelations, many thinkers at the time had sustained more ancient ways of thinking, including the geocentric view that the Earth was at the centre of our universe. Copernicus theorized in 1543 that all of the planets that we knew of revolved not around the Earth, but the Sun, a system that was later upheld by Galileo at his own expense. Offering up such a theory during a time of high tension between scientific and religious minds was branded as heresy, and any such heretics that continued to spread these lies were to be punished by imprisonment or even death. (48) Despite attempts by the Church to suppress this new generation of logicians and rationalists, more explanations for how the universe functioned were being made at a rate that the people could no longer ignore. It was with these great revelations that a new kind of philosophy founded in reason was born. The Church’s long-standing dogma was losing the great battle for truth to rationalists and scientists. This very fact embodied the new ways of thinking that swept through Europe during most of the 17th century. (49) As many took on the duty of trying to integrate reasoning and scientific philosophies into the world, the Renaissance was over and it was time for a new era—the Age of Reason. The 17th and 18th centuries were times of radical change and curiosity. Scientific method, reductionism and the questioning of Church ideals was to be encouraged, as were ideas of liberty, tolerance and progress. (50) Such actions to seek knowledge and to understand what information we already knew were captured by the Latin phrase “sapere aude” or ‘dare to know’, after Immanuel Kant used it in his essay “An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment?”. It was the purpose and responsibility of great minds to go forth and seek out the truth, which they believed to be founded in knowledge.
Echo 参考译文、难点评析与错误点总结
说明:以下为 Echo 生成的非官方参考译文和学习解析,用于自测、批改和复盘;不等同于官方答案。
Echo 参考译文
- 随着教会的教义和思维模式因文艺复兴而暗淡无光,中世纪和现代两个历史时期之间架起了桥梁,进而通向了崭新和未探索过的知识领域。
- 在他们的每项发现之前,当时的许多思想家一直沿袭着更加古老的思维模式,其中包括认为地球处于宇宙中心的地心说。
- 尽管教会屡屡打压这些新一代的逻辑学家和理性主义者,但关于宇宙运行原理的阐释还是不断涌现,其速度让世人再也无法视而不见。
- 当很多人承担起试图将理性思维和科学思想融入大千世界这一责任时,文艺复兴即告结束,新的时代从此开启。
- 拉丁语短语“sapere aude”即“敢于求知”,准确地概括了这类寻求知识和理解已知信息的行为。
整体难点评析
本文主题可归为“考古发现与历史遗址”。英语一翻译通常为 5 个划线句,每句 2 分。复盘时应逐句拆主干、定修饰范围,再检查抽象名词和逻辑关系是否落到中文里。
- 结构难点:重点关注名词化结构、被动与非谓语、逻辑连接、修饰后置、长句主干识别。先找主句谓语,再处理从句、分词、介词短语和插入成分,避免在中文里把修饰关系接错。
- 词义难点:不要机械使用词典第一义,尤其是抽象名词、学术动词和评价性形容词。应根据上下文确定它们是在表示事实、趋势、原因、态度还是结果。
- 逻辑难点:翻译时要显化英语中的因果、转折、让步、递进和目的关系。中文可以调整语序,但不能丢掉逻辑方向。
- 表达难点:中文译文要准确优先,再追求通顺。可以适度增补主语或承接词,但不能加入原文没有的信息。
常见错误点总结
- 主干误判:把修饰成分当主句,或漏掉真正谓语,会导致整句方向错误。
- 修饰范围错误:定语从句、分词短语和介词短语常常后置,翻译时要判断它修饰哪个名词或动作。
- 抽象名词处理生硬:如 process、approach、engagement、movement、connection 等词,要根据上下文译成“过程、方式、参与、运动、联系”等合适表达。
- 逻辑词漏译或反译:but、despite、while、so、as、with 等小词常决定句子关系,是扣分高发点。
- 中文表达不成句:逐词硬贴会让译文读不通。建议译完后用中文默读一遍,检查主语、谓语、宾语和逻辑连接是否完整。
Discussion
Comments
Thoughts, corrections, and follow-up notes are welcome here.